Contents

Manufacturing Insight: Differences Between 304 And 316 Stainless Steel

Material Selection Precision in CNC Machining: 304 vs. 316 Stainless Steel

Selecting the optimal stainless steel grade is critical for part performance, longevity, and cost-effectiveness in demanding applications. At Honyo Prototype, our CNC machining expertise ensures you leverage the distinct properties of common alloys like 304 and 316 stainless steel. While both offer excellent corrosion resistance and formability, key compositional differences significantly impact suitability for specific environments. The primary distinction lies in molybdenum content, which directly enhances resistance to chlorides and acids.

Below is a technical comparison of core properties:

Property 304 Stainless Steel 316 Stainless Steel
Key Alloying Addition 18% Cr, 8% Ni 16% Cr, 10% Ni, 2-3% Mo
Molybdenum (Mo) None 2-3%
Chloride Resistance Moderate Superior
Acid Resistance Good Enhanced
Typical Applications Food processing, architectural trim, fasteners Marine hardware, chemical processing, medical implants

Choosing incorrectly—such as using 304 in high-salinity environments—risks premature pitting corrosion and compromised part integrity. Honyo Prototype’s engineering team guides material selection based on your operational demands, ensuring machined components meet stringent functional and regulatory requirements. Our precision CNC milling and turning processes are optimized for both grades, maintaining tight tolerances while mitigating challenges like work hardening.

Accelerate your prototyping or production timeline with Honyo Prototype’s Online Instant Quote system. Upload your CAD file to receive a detailed manufacturability analysis and competitive pricing within hours, backed by our commitment to material science expertise and on-time delivery.


Technical Capabilities

Technical Comparison: 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel for Precision Machining Applications

When selecting between 304 and 316 stainless steel for high-precision CNC machining processes such as 3/4/5-axis milling and turning, especially in tight tolerance applications, understanding the material properties and machinability differences is critical. These alloys are commonly used alongside materials like aluminum, steel, ABS, and nylon in prototyping and production environments at Honyo Prototype. Below is a technical breakdown of the two stainless steels in the context of advanced CNC operations.

Parameter 304 Stainless Steel 316 Stainless Steel Notes for Machining & Application
Chemical Composition 18% Cr, 8% Ni, Balance Fe 16% Cr, 10% Ni, 2% Mo, Balance Fe Molybdenum in 316 enhances corrosion resistance, especially against chlorides and acids
Corrosion Resistance Good general corrosion resistance Superior, especially in marine and chemical environments 316 preferred for parts exposed to harsh environments or sterilization
Tensile Strength 515 MPa (75,000 psi) 570 MPa (83,000 psi) 316 offers slightly higher strength, beneficial in structural precision components
Hardness (Brinell) ~200 HB ~215 HB 316 is slightly harder, leading to increased tool wear during milling and turning
Machinability Rating 70% (relative to 1212 steel) 55% 304 is easier to machine; 316 work-hardens more aggressively and requires optimized toolpaths
Work Hardening Tendency Moderate High 316 requires sharp tools, consistent feeds, and minimized idle time to avoid surface hardening
Thermal Conductivity 16.2 W/m·K 15.1 W/m·K Lower conductivity in 316 increases heat retention at the cutting edge, demanding effective cooling
Typical Tooling Used Carbide with sharp edge, PVD coating Rigid carbide, high positive rake, AlTiN coating 316 benefits from advanced coatings and high-pressure coolant
Tight Tolerance Suitability Excellent with proper fixturing Good, but requires compensation for thermal growth and springback Both require dry runs and in-process metrology; 316 needs more frequent tool inspection
Ideal for 3/4/5-Axis Milling Yes – predictable chip formation Yes – with optimized parameters and rigid setups 316 benefits from high-speed machining (HSM) toolpaths to reduce dwell and heat
Turning Performance Smooth finish achievable at high speeds Requires lower SFM and consistent feed to manage heat Interrupted cuts more challenging in 316 due to work hardening
Common Use Cases Food processing, general hardware, enclosures Medical devices, marine components, chemical processing 316 often used where sterilization or salt exposure is a factor
Compared to Other Materials Harder and tougher than aluminum, ABS, nylon; similar strength to mild steel but better corrosion resistance Higher performance than 304, aluminum, and engineering plastics in corrosive settings Aluminum machines faster; ABS and nylon require different tooling and lower clamping forces

Summary for CNC Operations at Honyo Prototype

For tight tolerance 3/4/5-axis milling and turning operations, 304 stainless steel is often the default choice due to its balanced machinability and cost-effectiveness. However, when parts are intended for medical, marine, or high-corrosion environments, 316 is the preferred material despite its increased machining difficulty. Compared to aluminum, both stainless grades are significantly harder and require more robust tooling and slower cycle times. Versus ABS and nylon, stainless steels demand higher precision in thermal management and vibration control to maintain dimensional accuracy.

Proper selection between 304 and 316 should consider not only the end-use environment but also the complexity of the geometry, required surface finish, and tolerance specifications (e.g., ±0.0002″ for critical features). At Honyo Prototype, we optimize feeds, speeds, and toolpaths based on these factors to ensure consistent, high-accuracy results across all materials.


From CAD to Part: The Process

Honyo Prototype Material Specification Process: 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel Integration

Upon CAD upload, Honyo’s system performs an initial material validation check. The AI-driven quoting engine identifies declared stainless steel grades (304 or 316) within the CAD metadata or client specifications. If no grade is specified, the system flags the requirement for explicit client confirmation prior to quoting, as material selection critically impacts cost, manufacturability, and performance. During the AI Quote phase, differential pricing is applied based on grade selection—316 stainless steel typically incurs 15-25% higher material costs than 304 due to molybdenum content and enhanced corrosion resistance properties. The quote explicitly itemizes material cost implications to ensure client awareness of budgetary trade-offs.

The Design for Manufacturability (DFM) analysis is where material differentiation undergoes rigorous engineering validation. Honyo’s manufacturing engineers assess the functional requirements against the selected grade, focusing on three critical factors: operating environment (e.g., exposure to chlorides, acids, or saltwater), mechanical stress demands, and regulatory compliance needs. For marine or chemical processing applications, 316 is strongly recommended due to its molybdenum-enhanced pitting resistance; 304 may be sufficient for dry, non-corrosive environments. Engineers verify grade suitability against ASME or ASTM standards and may propose grade substitution if the initial selection risks premature failure or over-engineering. Material properties validated during this phase include:

Property 304 Stainless Steel 316 Stainless Steel Critical Differentiation Point
Molybdenum Content None 2.0-3.0% Enables superior chloride resistance
Pitting Resistance Eq. ~19 ~25 Higher PREN = better corrosion defense
Typical Applications Food processing, architecture Marine hardware, pharmaceuticals Dictates grade selection logic
Relative Cost Baseline +15-25% Direct impact on project budgeting

During production, Honyo implements strict material traceability protocols. All stainless steel stock undergoes mill certificate verification, with 316 lots requiring additional documentation confirming molybdenum composition. Machining parameters are adjusted per grade—316’s work-hardening characteristics necessitate reduced feed rates and specialized tooling to maintain dimensional accuracy. Final quality control includes PMI (Positive Material Identification) testing via handheld XRF analyzers to chemically verify grade compliance against the work order, preventing material cross-contamination.

At delivery, Honyo provides comprehensive material traceability documentation, including certified mill test reports and PMI validation records specific to each shipment. For mission-critical applications (e.g., medical or aerospace), we supply full ASME BPVC-compliant material certifications. This end-to-end material governance ensures clients receive components with precisely specified corrosion resistance properties, eliminating field failures due to incorrect stainless steel selection while optimizing total project cost.


Start Your Project

Understanding the differences between 304 and 316 stainless steel is critical for selecting the right material for your application. 304 stainless steel offers excellent corrosion resistance and formability, making it ideal for general-purpose use in environments with mild exposure to corrosive elements. It contains 18% chromium and 8% nickel, providing reliable performance across a wide range of industrial, commercial, and consumer applications.

In contrast, 316 stainless steel contains molybdenum (typically 2–3%), which significantly enhances its resistance to chlorides and acidic environments. This makes 316 the preferred choice for marine environments, chemical processing, and medical equipment where superior corrosion resistance is essential.

Mechanical properties between the two grades are similar, but the added durability of 316 in harsh conditions often justifies its higher cost when long-term performance is a priority.

For technical guidance on material selection tailored to your project requirements, contact Susan Leo at [email protected]. With our manufacturing facility located in Shenzhen, Honyo Prototype delivers precision fabrication and rapid prototyping services using both 304 and 316 stainless steel, ensuring optimal material pairing with your design and environmental demands.

Property 304 Stainless Steel 316 Stainless Steel
Chromium Content 18% 18%
Nickel Content 8% 10–12%
Molybdenum Content None 2–3%
Corrosion Resistance Good Excellent (especially to chlorides)
Typical Applications Kitchen equipment, fasteners, piping Marine components, pharmaceutical, chemical processing
Cost Lower Higher

Partner with Honyo Prototype for expert material consultation and high-precision manufacturing from our Shenzhen facility. Reach out to Susan Leo today to ensure your project leverages the right stainless steel grade for performance and longevity.


🚀 Rapid Prototyping Estimator

Estimate rough cost index based on volume.